In what way does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
After looking through various horror films, I discovered that they all have very similar characters and plots. There is always a killer if it’s supernatural or human, there is always a specific victim who is usually the main character and the story is usually based on the victim resulting in defeating the killer whether it’s in one film or after a series.
We found it fairly difficult to use all of the same conventions in the

.jpg)
We kept similar characters in our film as we had the main horror character, or ‘the killer’, and we had a single mum trying to control the situation as it grows out of her hands, this was the base of our characters but if we were to shoot the whole thing we would introduce more conventional characters as I think they are necessary to generate a good horror film
How does your media product represent particular social groups?


What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?



Horror films often have sub-genres and I felt that our film opening can be classed as a psychological horror or supernatural thriller as it is about a possessed girl and her story as the demon within, slowly takes over. There were various films around that are based on possessed people; I also found that exorcism films slightly related to the same category so as these closely relate to our film I researched the production companies that make them. I found that Warner Bros., despite it being an unlikely consideration, made a few similar films, for example Fallen(1998), which wasn’t particularly successful, however The Exorcist(1972) balanced this as it has been nominated for 10 Academy Awards and 7 Golden Globes, from which they won 6 in total, which suggests that these films can be successful. Constantine(2005) also managed to generate $230,884,728 at the box office and The Wicker Man(1973/2006) clearly the 1973 success encouraged the remake, which was also perceived well showing that this type of film is still good for the modern day film industry. Each of these films would have displayed similar conventions and ideas and therefore would have been directed towards a similar audience so I felt Warner Bros. had the potential to produce our film, also I think the success that was generated from these films suggests that psychological horror is a genre that is still appreciated by the audience.


Who would be the audience for your media product?
Typical conventions of psychological thrillers may effect the type of audience that would enjoy watching our film, for example, psychological horrors tend to contain less gore and blood, this can make our horror film more suitable for squeamish viewers. Horrors like ours can relate to the audience and demonstrate scary stories from everyday situations which can enhance the fear of it happening to you, these type of films are also slightly slower and more based around tension building and mental fear. I think that these features appeal more to women, because I think that men enjoy watching more physical/gory horrors.


Another consideration as to which women would watch this film would be income, if someone has a low income, possibly unemployed, they may not be as inclined to spend money they do not have for the cinema. Alternatively those who are employed are more likely to be the ones willing to spend disposable income on the film. However, women that have full-time careers may not have the time to sit and watch a film, this could interrupt the idea of working women being the ones to watch it, however, part-time workers may have the money and the time to watch our film, so our prioritized target audience would be part-time working women aged 20+.
My mum is an ideal example of our target market as she is a female part-time worker of the ideal age, as a part-time worker she is able to use the extra free time available effectively to free up weekends slightly better, this could give her time to travel to a cinema and watch our film. She doesn't have many hobbies or interests, as she likes to allow herself as much free time as possible, however she does watch television in the evening and enjoys listening to the radio. She is also a fan of psychological films, especially those that have a twist, so if we had created our full film it could appeal well to her.
How did you attract/address your audience?
As I mentioned before, we did some market research and discovered that there is an audience out there that would like to watch our film. With the target audience I just mentioned we would look to create a trailer as I would judge our audience to be people who watch television, ideally it would be between television programmes such as soap operas like Coronation Street or cooking programmes, they don't really have a lot of relevance to our film but both types of programmes that I believe they would watch. However, due to the watershed hours we would not be able to show a horror film advert at these times, so from our research we asked what television programmes they watch between 9:00 and 5:30, these programmes included more serial dramas like ‘Being Human’ and ‘Whitechapel’ which do actually fit in well with the horror genre, so this could be an optimum position for our adverts.


What have you learned about technologies from the from the process of constructing this product?

On the parts of editing I was responsible for, I found the rendering aspect to be quite annoying and awkward as it added considerable time to complete the editing but the rest of the software contained similar abilities as moviemaker. It just required a bit of attention to work out how to complete certain tasks.
In regards to filming we found that on our first trip to Weston where there was an ideal location, the camera ran out of battery during filming so we had to wait a considerable number of days before we could begin filming again due to other commitments that prevented people from being available. After this time we decided to change our location as the other position wasn't practical enough, but we did learn from the mistake and were sure to charge the camera before filming. We decided that during our film we would have parts where the daughter would suddenly disappear or appear; this required difficult and well-timed camera work and more takes than other scenes and despite many attempts still came out quite amateur.
We felt our non-diegetic music was good and we were easily able to download it from the Internet and put that straight on our film, this was straight forward but effective and, in my opinion, one of the more important parts of the film. Also at the beginning we added the tune of ‘twinkle twinkle little star’ which is a classic nursery rhyme, but in the film it came across very sinister and was depicted completely differently to the standard expectation of the music. The diegetic sound included shouts from the mum, otherwise we didn’t include anything else as the silence throughout the film built up tension and intrigue so we thought it was effective.
Looking back at your preliminary task what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to full product?
I felt that we had various similarities and differences between our two tasks, one similarity if the fact that both films have quite a mysterious element to them and the audience aren't particularly sure about the whole story and this could encourage them to want to find out more. I also think our sound is similar because we were trying to generate tension and anxiety which required good non-diegetic sound, I believe this was achieved well in both.
I found that our preliminary task wasn't great when looking at continuity issues however because we made this mistake with our practice task we were able to be more aware of it with our main task. For example, a minor issue that we remembered to keep the same was which hand the mum held the coat in, this was quite an insignificant part of the film but something we had to bare in mind, so we were able to get a slight idea of what real film crews have to think about. I also think we came to a better realization as to how long it actually takes to film so we were able to account for this for our main opening and with. Our better time management the battery problem didn't become as major as it could have. There were a couple of things that didn't work as well as the preliminary task, for example, the editing for the first task was done on windows movie maker which meant it was faster and still effective as I was able to complete it in one night, however due to the fact we had to use a Mac it was harder for us to gain access to one and the rendering aspect took a while so it took about a week to complete editing. Also with our first task I manned the camera and did the editing, this worked well as I was able to film what I knew would work when editing however because we distributed the jobs more fairly I filmed whilst having less input on the editing so there had more potential to be clashes of visual thoughts or ideas, I think that our group worked well together so this wasn't a huge problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment